PrepAwayDumps The minutes show that Equal had serious doubts about the statistical process it used to award grades, with a meeting on 4 August hearing that the board was “very concerned about the prospect of some students, in particular so-called outliers, being awarded unreliable results”. Advertisement The board’s members “accepted reluctantly that there was no valid and defensible way to deal with this pre-results”. But despite the board’s doubts, Equal officials continued to insist in public
PrepAway Dumps that its results would be reliable. Roger Taylor, the Equal chair, wrote in a newspaper article on 9 August that “students will get the best estimate that can be made of the grade they would have achieved if exams had gone ahead.”
Comments (0)